The following is a very brief excerpt from an article in the Deseret News titled "St. George metro area growth ranks 2nd in U.S." by Deborah Bulkeley and Nancy Perkins Published: Thursday, March 27, 2008 12:29 a.m. MDT.
Although the article speaks mostly about Saint George (an area I don't service, but do send referrals to) it also mentions Salt Lake and some of the surrounding counties which I do cover:
"The Provo-Orem metro area, which ranks eighth nationally in growth since 2000, ranks 34th in its one-year growth of 2.6 percent. And the Ogden-Clearfield metro area ranked 26th with 2.9 percent growth.
Utah's largest metro area - Salt Lake - grew by 2 percent, reaching an estimated population of 1.1 million. And the Logan metro area grew by 2.2 percent."
Essentially, we appear to have experienced collective growth in the 2-3% range (population).
People still flock to Utah because of the environment, the jobs, the lifestyle, the mountains, and yes, even today, the affordable housing. (Compared to other Western Metropolitain areas.)
If you are thinking about moving to the Salt Lake City area, make sure you get an Agent on YOUR side!
Homebuyer Representation, Inc. is the only Real Estate Brokerage representing Buyers ONLY in Salt Lake City and the Surrounding Area. We do not list any homes. We never represent Sellers.
We work for BUYERS ONLY on the Buyer's side of the transaction.
We work to get BUYERS the Best Price and Terms when they Buy...
We're "The Real Estate Agents on the Buyer's Side" TM
If you have excellent credit and are thinking about buying a $250,000-$500,000 home in the Salt Lake area in the next 60-90 days, call us at (801) 969-8989 or contact us via the link on this page.
©2008 Homebuyer Representation, Inc. All Rights Reserved



I came across this while reading an article today about financing and the state of the real estate market. I thought I would check it out (since it's free, right?) and see how accurate it could guess my credit score.
Utah only got an A minus according to 
I have clients who have lived in peace in nice neighborhoods: either quaint, turn of the century era bungalow communities (no... the OTHER century...) or neighborhoods where homes were spaced out on one-third to full-acre lots surrounded by mature trees, wildlife and a slow pace. Now, developers are being allowed to tear down homes, trees, and other amenities to create the McMansion neighborhood in and around these areas that were previously desirable specifically because they LACKED what the McMansion developments bring to town.
The blame surely must fall with the governmental agencies that are allowing the developers to put these developments in these desirable areas. Governments ignore the negative impact on those who previously occupied the areas because a McMansion community in a desirable area brings higher tax dollars (and more of them due to the same reasoning above).